GA-IN BY(e) PAiN

Its coming..i can feel it..the growing energy..inside and outside..accelerated tension and pressure..pushing the limits of control and freedom..another brick in the occupation-wall..pandoras box in action..truth is God..in love for his children..always one step ahead..because he is the ultimate and absolute player and winner of all games..so choosing his side is propably the best decision a soul can ever make..thats what this is actually all about..and why humanity has to face this extreme challenge..in order to awake and evolve..rise like phoenix-gods from the chaos-ashes into the sunlight of true life..expressing the eternal spirit-reality..in multi-faced variations of the same divine source..the perfect unity in diversity..many but one and all..here we are..this is it..

THE NEW LOVE ORDER!

Although, corruption, i.e., ‘misuse of public power for private gain’ is disliked in its essence because of its detrimental effects on the development of a country, it is pervasive and exists in every country of the world, with varying degrees. Apart from the general negative consequences of corruption, it is considered a major obstacle in reducing inequality, poverty and infant mortality in developing countries.

The military is not elected by anyone and for that reason, its intervention in the political process of a country, even at a peripheral level, is harmful for the democratic process and accountability. Some of its other important implications are as follows: the military may be involved in government on account of an actual or created internal or external threat to national sovereignty. This situation implies the distortion of government policy because certain policy options need to be required and implemented to meet this threat; for instance, a reallocation of budget in favor of the military at the cost of other important budget allocations. The threat of a military take over can force an elected government to change its policy in line with the desires of the military or may even replace it by another government more acquiescent to the wishes of the military. If a military take over, or a threat of take over, indicates inability of the present government to function effectively then the economy will pose high risks for foreign businesses and a full-scale military regime poses the greatest risk. Although a military regime may temporarily provide stability and therefore reduce risks for businesses in the short term, in the longer term risk will almost certainly rise for two major reasons: the system of governance will be become corrupt and, second, the continuation of such a government may create an armed opposition.

Military leaders improve their personal financial condition by frequent involvement in the economic system. To do this, they seek close working relations with local and foreign businessmen. The military manages a secure business environment while businessmen provide capital and entrepreneurial skills. The engagement of the military in economic corruption is greatest when the military are involved in the political process. In other words, the opportunities for economic corruption for the military are greatest when its role in politics increases. The civilian leaders provide opportunities for senior army officials to increase their personal wealth in reward for their loyalty to the stability of the political regime. Politicians may approach the military for direct intervention in government, to limit the power of political opponents, or the politician may tacitly acquiesce to such involvement.

The elites also control corrupt patron-client networks. The centralized corrupt patron-client networks usually evolve with the involvement of the military into politics and are likely to vanish in the presence of democratic process. The basic purpose of centralized patron-client networks by the elites is to provide protection rents to entrepreneurs in exchange for kickbacks. The elite collusion rewards few at the cost of the mass of the population, thereby generating important income inequalities in economies where these factors exist.

The institutions like judiciary, law and order all are weekend in the presence of strong ties of the elites and the system cannot itself make break the unison of the elites. In order to protect their mutual interests, and in view of a possible conflict amongst the elite, they develop family ties through institutions such as marriage, to reinforce their interests.
Dissolution of the elites is unlikely because if any one class of elites disagrees with others and isolates itself from the group, then the cost of isolation is much higher than the gain. The major cost of isolation is possible legal prosecution (action) against past misdeeds. This is analogous to the prisoner’s dilemma where benefits are maximized if no one betrays the others.
Because armed soldiers have the power to rebel against the state or create a coup, their independence from politics serves as an ever present threat to the body politic if they are tempted to become corrupt. Conversely, if the military itself departs from its professionalism and joins the civilian elite then there is no further threat to corruption unless some form of mass revolt from the general public occurs, which is indeed a rare case.

Conspiracy theory is a very controversial subject and has captivated the media‟s attention for countless years. Journalists, due to their exceptional capability to sniff out a story, have actively leaked and exposed information of a classified nature in an effort to prove to themselves and anyone who will listen just how prominent government corruption really is.

On a global scale every nation funds its own team of secret police and military enforcers whose prime objective is to sustain and develop national-security strategies and policy. Understandably the majority of their activities are conducted covertly on an extensive level; MI6, the CIA and the KGB being prime examples. Their various dealings have always been enlightening if not interesting, suggesting they have murdered, poisoned, gassed, drugged and brainwashed enemies of the state and unwitting citizenry on a surprisingly frequent basis. It is also proven fact that these intelligence-gathering establishments have conducted unethical testing on their own soldiers and intelligence personnel using a varied range of lethal arsenal. Journalists have detailed these arcane schemes and suspicious goings-on in their books, magazines, movies and television documentaries. „Mind Control‟ in particular has taken centre stage.

Since the beginning of civilisation topical issues concerning the human brain have always attracted substantial attention for a number of obvious reasons. The human brain is a most valuable asset and extremely unique, as it holds the precious cocktail of individuality and personality. It is what separates the timid from the aggressive and the academically gifted from Mr Average. The brain controls physical movement, all cognitive capabilities (memory, counting and language) and regulates a vast array of bodily functions.
Although substantial headway has been made in pursuit of understanding the brain and its function, scientists are still a long way from mastering and controlling the mechanisms that work within it. This situation has uncovered many dilemmas for law-enforcement agencies, the military and medical communities, who all believe there is great potential to be found in mastering physical control of the brain and mind.
Criminal psychologists, for example, are no longer blaming environmental circumstance and adverse social conditioning as the sole cause of criminal activity. They stress some individuals may be more susceptible to committing murders and assaults due to their inherited genetic wiring. This theory asserts that there are chemicals within the brain which can trigger anger and antisocial behaviour. Those who commit grievous bodily harm may be victims of chemical imbalances which they are unable to control without the intervention of drugs and other inhibitors. Naturally it is hoped that brain exploration will offer some answers.
Medical practitioners and surgeons believe chemicals in the brain that influence behaviour may be supplemented or suppressed by drugs which in the long run can make an individual‟s behaviour more desirable and manageable. They foresee great potential in the use of implants and other artificial aids to assist the body‟s performance and maintain organs to optimal working condition. Consultants view the exploration and control of the brain as a fascinating realm of discovery where new breakthroughs in psychiatric treatment and disease can be made. Utilising medical research and analysis, their sole objective is to rid the world of every brain dysfunction and life-threatening condition known to mankind.
The military, unlike the medical and law-enforcement professions, hold slightly different interests in brain exploration. The brain, in their eyes, contains the ultimate secret to world domination, biological warfare and intelligence gathering. They wish to discover newfound ways to torture, interrogate and annihilate enemy troops and civilians of opposing nations. They strongly believe that the man who can crack the complex code of human behaviour is the man who has the power to manipulate, control and modify the actions and thoughts of another.

Mind-control operatives establish themselves as law abiding social scientists whose prime objective is to nurture society to help it flourish and develop to its full potential. In the idyllic society man is co-operative, productive, law abiding and happy to help his fellow man. He is flawless, a well-balanced individual with the drive and motivation to promote and encourage happiness wherever he goes. There is no place in harmonious society for his exact antithesis. Via tampering with the human brain MCs hope to determine what causes differences in behaviour and find ways of manipulating the natural processes of thought and behaviour with the intention of ultimately dictating it.

Implants are attractive in the sense that they are hidden from view within the body and are difficult to detect and remove without professional intervention. One would have to gain access to sanitised operating equipment, x-rays, anaesthesia and a skilled surgeon.
Bearing in mind the surveillance perspective, the possibilities are vast for intelligence agencies: audio equipment may be inserted under the skin, possibly within the face or arms, and enable operatives to eavesdrop on all of an implanted subject‟s verbal conversations.
This tactic surpasses all opportunities offered by phone tapping and roof surveillance, which are limited once the subject leaves his bugged household. Interaction with strangers and associates in the street is also acquirable without operatives having to rely on second-hand information from bystanders and culprits who may deceive. The most advanced implantable device is undoubtedly one which incorporates all five features of tracking, monitoring, manipulation, audio technology and radio communication.

Mind control is a form of brain rape and torture; whether the affliction is caused by drug administration, electromagnetic stimulation, brainwashing or the nurture of personality disorders, the end result remains the same. The target is forced to endure continued harassments. IS mind control, in particular, is likened to slavery because the target‟s brain and mind are tapped for research against his will. He is helpless to prevent the intrusion and resist the brain‟s physical and mental reaction to electrode stimulation.

The government, of course, denies that Mind Controllers exist. Exposure of their antics would prove undoubtedly that the government is committing criminal acts against the people it is sworn to protect. Exposure would also make folly of the laws which govern civilised society.
The answer to the problem is certainly clear; MCs are criminals and should be prosecuted as such. Greater openness and education regarding mind control will help aid the legal process and eventual conviction of the perpetrators who wish to make political and financial gain from the suffering of others. It is especially important that those involved in mental health understand mind control methodology and find ways to effectively treat and reverse the prolonged physical and psychological effects endured by victims and their families.

Here’s an example of the phases in a modern day behavior modification program:
Phase 1. Deny all contact with outside world. Deny interaction between “students”. Deny basic needs as punishment (food, sleep, clothing, heat, water, etc.). Create confusion and use physical and mental exhaustion as a tool to breakdown “old behaviors”. This causes a complete mental breakdown in the child. (Forced betrayal of one’s self.)
Phase 2. Once a child becomes “agreeable” to submission, small “rewards” are given for obedience and the risk of being returned to the earlier phase is held out as the worst punishment one can receive. Children are persuaded to make up stories (false confessions) about themselves and others in the program in order to get rewarded for their “honesty”. (Forced betrayal of one’s peers.)
Phase 3. The child has no more opinion of him/herself based on own selfimage or the reflection of his/her peers. The child completely loses and disassociates between “old life/old behavior” and “new life/new behavior”. (Complete mental/emotional breakdown and intentional creation of disassociative disorder.)
Phase 4. The child is completely submissive and brainwashed. The child hates everything they once were or knew. The child only feels safe in the program and only credits the program with his/her success. Child is given “responsibility” to “lead” other children. (Child is now brainwashed and actively aiding his captors in brainwashing others.)
These methods are destructive and violate every sacred human right. “To force thousands and even millions of teenagers into…treatment against their will would not only be unethical, wrong-headed, and useless, it would further humiliate and alienate them.” Our children deserve better.

Many groups deliberately target civilians as a tactic to achieve their political goals, including government forces, armed rebel groups, and terrorist organizations. The security of the population is also a prerequisite for an enduring political arrangement between two warring groups. Thus civilian protection is important to the broader political goals of creating and upholding peace agreements. Preventing attacks on civilians also preempts spoilers from creating instability and weakening fragile peace processes in post-war environments.

In order to credibly and consistently deliver sufficient incentives to encourage and maintain large-scale civilian support, insurgents must possess some extant ability to control land, markets, or resources. Strong rebel organizations may be able to provide parallel political systems, public services, and similar incentives, but such goods exceed the capabilities of most rebel organizations. For this reason, weak insurgents are likely to be outbid by the government. Even in the context of high repression and low state capacity, incumbent regimes are likely able to offer a more competitive deal than are insurgents. Moreover, the threat of punishment by state security forces is likely to deter collaboration unless the insurgents can promise a reasonable degree of protection from government reprisals. Facing a highly unequal balance of capabilities, weak insurgent groups may view violence as an inexpensive alternative to supplying positive incentives to (temporarily) expand their resource base. In the immediate term, violence directed against the population may undermine the sovereignty of the regime, reconfigure the social or political organization of a community, and provide insurgents with a minimum level of tangible or human resources. These factors are likely to temporarily translate into increased rebel capacity, either indirectly by creating conditions that favor the insurgents (fear, disorder, regime violence) or directly through captured loot or forced collaboration.

The Third World War is neither an epic drama nor a glittering extravaganza designed for prime-time audiences; it is playing now in theaters everywhere. It is the other side of the “long peace,” an offshoot of the Cold War, life on the “wrong side of the tracks.” In the Third World War there are no war heroes, no ticker-tape parades, no armistice day celebrations. There are only grief and gaunt faces, squalid camps and unplowed fields, empty classrooms and children toting automatic weapons. The Third World War is a stupendous human tragedy being performed almost entirely by amateurs. Little attention is paid in the mainstream academic literature to the continuing sagas of violence and strife in the Third World War; its poignant imagery of pain and suffering provides occasional news that titillates our humanitarian concerns before being lost in a confluence with our relief at being “above that sort of thing.” Our modern, sophisticated theories and understandings do not fit Third World facts very well, often rendering analysis and policy prescription ineffective, counter-productive, or exacerbative. It seems easier to discount the discrepancies with disdain by assuming that these “primitives” and “fundamentalists” are simply irrational, mean, and brutal, that they haven’t yet learned (or are unable to learn) how to behave and to conduct themselves properly in civil society. Unfortunately, our condescension and arrogance belie our own ignorance and irresponsibility. “We” are the executive producers of this great passion play: “we” supply both the lethal props for the military machinery and the consolation for its many victims; “we” might even intervene personally to straighten things out when the play strays from the script or threatens to evade effective containment or victimize one from our own.

The trouble with our comprehension of the Third World War lies in the fact that it isn’t really a war at all, at least not of the kind we have traditionally thought about as being a war. We prefer to think of turmoil and violence in this “remote” part of the world as simply an endless series of relatively minor skirmishes between mostly insignificant actors within an unfortunate context of poverty and ignorance, venality and vindictiveness. Because we focus mainly on the institutionalized aspects of political violence and war, armed combat between contending professional armies, we tend to overlook real warfare transpiring among mostly uncoordinated militia and spontaneous uprisings comprising or encompassing the various elements of a nascent and naive civil society: minor league and sandlot war.

Technology has brought us all closer together, vastly improved the quality of life for the fortunate, and continues to threaten the unfortunate daily with the experience of ever more unspeakable horrors. Everyone living within an organic, social system has a vital stake in the proper maintenance of the system and responsibility in supervising the proper, humane applications of technology. Complex interdependence has made it necessary to take systems into account in all issue areas. Greater communication and information systems have made systemic conflict analysis possible. The final collapse of the colonial and Cold War world systems have granted us a historic moment to view the world system from a unique perspective and gain insight on the societal effects of political violence.

There is a parallel narrative to the story of world system development: it is the culture of violence that has characterized human relations throughout recorded history. We are only beginning to chronicle the full extent of the “utility” of violence in the evolution of political relations and the establishment of modern societies. Violence certainly has been instrumental in the organizational process of politics, however, one can not take the logical leap to assert that it has been necessary. If that were the case the paradox of societal development would stand as an unsolvable dilemma and war would be an inevitable and unavoidable facet of that process. We would truly be condemned to repeat the experience of wars past. Development would be explicable only in light of humankind’s technological inadequacy and its collective inability to finally accomplish its own annihilation and thereby put a final end to human development. Technological progress is now providing us that capability and this fact obviates the philosophical debate. The key to the dilemma can no longer be construed, in rational terms, as learning to survive the culture of violence (i.e., to victimize rather than to be victimized—survival of the fittest) as that is a rapidly diminishing option; the key is to transform the culture of violence to non-violent conflict management and thereby remove systemic fetters on the development process so that all may survive and prosper. De-victimization is the foundation of normative society and the rule-of-law system.

Perhaps the greatest injustice of cultural dominance is that it allows the dominant group to impose its own interpretations of social life upon all others. This affects what is invested in, both in terms of cultural products and in terms of economic decisions –– how we value some neighborhoods, cities and regions over others, whether we see certain uses of public funds as ‘good investments’ or ‘bad investments,’ and whether we value public education enough to invest in all children or just some children. In other words, there are both cultural and material consequences of cultural chauvinism. It reinforces marginalization and powerlessness.

Institutional Oppression occurs when established laws, customs, and practices systematically reflect and produce inequities based on one’s membership in targeted social identity groups. If oppressive consequences accrue to institutional laws, customs, or practices, the institution is oppressive whether or not the individuals maintaining those practices have oppressive intentions. Institutional Oppression creates a system of invisible barriers limiting people based on their membership in unfavored social identity groups. The barriers are only invisible to those “seemingly” unaffected by it. The practice of institutionalized oppression is based on the belief in inherent superiority or inferiority. Institutionalized oppression is a matter of result regardless of intent.

Stereotypes are attitudes, beliefs, feelings and assumptions about a target group that are widespread AND socially sanctioned. Can be positive and negative, but all have negative effects. Stereotypes support the maintenance of institutionalized oppression by seemingly validating misinformation or beliefs.

Prejudice is favorable or unfavorable opinion or feeling about a person or group, usually formed without knowledge, thought or reason. It can be based on a single experience, which is then transferred to or assumed about all potential experiences.

Overt forms of oppression are open and observable, not secret or hidden. The target of overt oppression is very aware of the intention and action of the oppressive act, and of the oppressive person or group.
Covert forms of oppression may be secret, hidden and not openly practiced, or so subtle that they are not readily obvious, even to the intended target. The person targeted with covert oppression may not even realize that an oppressive act has occurred until after the fact, nor be aware of who committed the act. Often, targets of covert forms of oppression may second guess themselves and their reactions to covert oppression.

The federal government has a long history of making secret information it has created, collected, or otherwise taken into its custody. It has, as well, in a few instances, by statutory specification, made some kinds of privately created or held information subject to secrecy or special protection. The failure of the possessor of such information to safeguard it properly requires, in the face of penalties for not doing so, its surrender to the government for safekeeping. Also, each of the three constitutionally equal branches of the federal government may exert claims of secrecy, based upon asserted privileges and the separation-of powers doctrine, against the others when confronted with demands for information.

The best way to ensure that secrecy is respected, and that the most important secrets remain secret, is for secrecy to be returned to its limited but necessary role. Secrets can be protected more effectively if secrecy is reduced overall. Benefits can flow from moving information that no longer needs protection out of the classification system and, in appropriate cases, from not classifying at all. We live in an information-rich society, one in which more than ever before open sources—rather than covert means of collection—can provide the information necessary to permit well-informed decisions. Too often, our secrecy system proceeds as if this information revolution has not happened, imposing costs by compartmentalizing information and limiting access. Greater openness permits more public understanding of the Government’s actions and also makes it more possible for the Government to respond to criticism and justify those actions. It makes free exchange of scientific information possible and encourages discoveries that foster economic growth. In addition, by allowing for a fuller understanding of the past, it provides opportunities to learn lessons from what has gone before—making it easier to resolve issues concerning the Government’s past actions and helping prepare for the future.

Secrecy surrounds us. It binds people together while simultaneously erecting boundaries secure from penetration by others. It is a potent force for social organization and a tool for social control. Individuals as well as institutions produce and keep secrets; indeed, secrecy and its cousin privacy are at the core of current debates over national security, intellectual property regimes in an age of digital information, and the relationship between knowledge and social context. If secrecy is the opposite of openness and truthtelling, as night is to day, then secrecy has few advocates outside the realm of military security. However, dusk and dawn separate night and day; secrecy and openness catch their own image in each other’s eyes.

The myth of the “independent Fed” is a smokescreen that is intended to keep the public in the dark about the true functions of the Fed as a financier of the political careers of congressional and executive branch incumbents and of the welfare/warfare state that enhances and consolidates their power. The talk by economists about how the Fed supposedly promotes economic stability is flatly contradicted by the Fed’s historical record of failure to stabilize either prices or unemployment. It is uninformed hokum at best and intentionally-crafted propaganda at worst.

The Catholic Church is the Great Harlot spoken of in the book of Revelations, it is the mother of all abominations on the Earth. It is reponsible for all crimes, poverty and slavery on this planet and very soon it will go up in flames forever due to all the crimes it has caused misusing God's name. They have fooled the nations, bewitched the nations by using their false "mercy" appearance to deceive and commit crimes. Enough is enough!

At present, there exists what appears to be a growing gap between technological change and the human capacity to adapt to that change. The risk is that the Government will make bad decisions not because it has too little information, but rather because it has too much information about the wrong things. In such a rapid-paced and changing environment, it is only natural to fall back on old biases, protocols, and shortcuts. Convictions, as Nietzsche once noted, can be “more dangerous enemies of truth than lies.”

There is an even more ominous dynamic at work here, however. Once violence becomes the means by which one succeeds in illegal markets, the enormous profits earned in those markets will attract competition from those elements of society who have a comparative advantage in violence and brutality. The most violent will rise to the top. Drug gangs are simply business partnerships, but unlike normal business partnerships in legal markets, they have great latitude in destroying their competitors by violent means. In legal markets, competitors can only be “destroyed” by producing better and/or cheaper products than theirs. In illegal markets competitors are often simply murdered. Murder is used to create “barriers to entry” into the business, to borrow a phrase from economics. The police are often “silent partners” in this murder and mayhem since existing drug gangsters can easily pay off the police and become “informants” and alert the police of any new entrants into their business. That way the police do their dirty work for them by arresting their competitors.